More success stories?
Shop & Newsletter they offer you:
For their successful, good life Information you really need: Government-funded publisher, awarded the Global Business Award as Publisher of the Year: Books, Shops, data-driven AI-Services. Print and online publications as well as the latest technology go hand in hand - with over 20 years of experience, partners like this Federal Ministry of Education, customers like Samsung, DELL, Telekom or universities. behind it Simone Janson, referenced in ARD, FAZ, ZEIT, WELT, Wikipedia.
Disclosure & Copyright: Images created as part of a free collaboration with Shutterstock. The article was first published by Verlag für die Deutsche Wirtschaft.
By Simone Janson (More) • Last updated on October 19.06.2022, XNUMX • First published on 11.01.2019/XNUMX/XNUMX • So far 5856 readers, 1806 social media shares Likes & Reviews (5 / 5) • Read & write comments
HR always face the difficult one decision, Employees to have to be fired. Or are there alternatives? Find out here how you can systematically come to a decision without having to say afterwards: “I should have known better!”
You have to make decisions all the time. Some are easier for you, others can make you sleep. When layoffs are pending, decisions are often particularly difficult.
You're supposed to be ten percent of the in your department Costs save on. And know: There is nothing left in the material resources! Now you're pondering under time pressure: Saving with the employees? To fire somebody? Whom? Fewer salary for all? Many of your decisions have far-reaching consequences for which you are responsible. Therefore: consider decisions carefully.
I would like to, but unfortunately I often don't have the time, you will say. It's not just you. Business Objects, a business intelligence provider Solutions and Business Week Research Services published a study on this.
This confirms: of 675 managers surveyed in Europe and the USA, two thirds make every second decision spontaneously and intuitively. But: 77 percent of managers also admit frequent wrong decisions. And these can Company Cost millions.
But you can learn to make good decisions even under time pressure. First you need to learn the techniques. Over time, the processes in your Head then automatically and you can do better, faster and more successfully decide.
9 typical decision-making problems - and the right solution: | |
Problem: | Solution: |
I often roll my thoughts back and forth with no result. | Visualize your thoughts in writing |
Many decisions are so complex that I don't even know where to start. | Make the guidelines clear, then continue step by step. |
Most of the time I don't have time to think about the problem sufficiently. | Practice dealing with time pressure. Apply first aid. |
I like to postpone difficult decisions, see everything too negatively or block myself in a similar way. | Understand what emotionally blocks you from making your decision. |
I just can't think of any alternatives. | Apply creativity techniques and find useful alternatives. |
I often need more information | Research relevant information |
I constantly rethink consequences and alternatives - without result! | Do all the calculations and you will get a concrete result. |
I often cannot implement decisions - especially with others. | Be consistent and use tools. |
Amazing that many People don't think in writing. A decision is rolled back and forth in the head or a list of pros and cons is sometimes written, but very few people write everything down in black and white, according to the well-known Munich resident Coach Gitte Harder. In fact, it's easier to make decisions when you have everything in front of you visually. Things to Learn the techniques for it.
Please note: Your procedure differs depending on the form of the day or the complexity of the decisions. At one point you make spontaneous decisions because you have the necessary experience, at other times you analyze everything. There are hardly any gut or head people, so don't put yourself in these drawers, but be open to new approaches.
You make every decision within certain parameters. This includes circumstances that were already there and perhaps make your decision necessary in the first place (e.g. economic Problems of your company), but also specifications such as period and Objective, which you do not from the Eyes verlieren allowed.
These are, for example, your character traits and personal experiences, which also unconsciously influence your decisions. They know best, like you Character is created. Then adjust your personal parameters.
Example: If you prefer to make rational decisions, you should make sure you have time to analyze the facts. If you had to make an ad hoc gut decision, you would be for sure unsatisfied with the result.
Remember: only if you remain largely true to yourself can you represent your decision in front of yourself and others.
It makes sense to have a clear scheme so that you have what is at stake during the entire decision-making process. Ask Yourself Honestly: What are the unchangeable conditions? How must the result be? But also: Which factors are indispensable for me personally? Fill such a frame with your own parameters:
External factors:
Personal factors:
Next week you should put your savings proposals on the table - and you feel themselves under pressure. The pressure is often less than you think. In many situations there is enough time to think in a structured way - it just depends on how you deal with it Stress evade!
Train the techniques to decision making in unstressful situations. The more exercise you have, the better you can handle it under pressure.
Ask about the reason for the time pressure. Who makes him Why? What speaks against making the decision in peace? Talk to the polluters. Give arguments why you need more time to make your decision. For example, you can say: I first need to know all the important facts in order to make the best possible decision.
It is often shown that the decision is not as urgent as initially thought. If there is a fire, there are some emergency measures:
First aid in an emergency:
Time pressure is just one factor that can inhibit you. Every day you have to make changes with your decisions. Giving up what you are used to can make you feel insecure. Don't just suppress your feelings, put them in writing - positive like negative. Because: Even positive feelings can "cloud" your decision if you accept consequences optimistic judge.
It is important that you get a comprehensive picture of your emotional state with regard to the upcoming decision. Only analysis enables you to deal with unpleasant emotional influences rationally. The following overview shows you which arguments you can use in typical blockage situations to convince yourself that this view will not help you.
Blockage that shows up like this: | You escape the emotional trap by making yourself clear: |
Complexity: I don `t know where to start. | Split your problem into sub-problems that you solve one after the other - so it's less complex. |
Self image: I hate making such decisions. | You have often and successfully like decisions of this kind, so the negative statement is unfounded. |
Put off: The problem will take care of itself if I wait! | Every delay is a decision. Accept the responsibility, make an appointment yourself! |
Surrender: There are only two ways. | There are several alternatives in many situations. Search and find them. |
Escape: I don't know a solution, so I avoid. | So you don't solve the problem, but probably even take it with you to the new situation. |
Inflation of meaning: The decision is irrevocable or vital, all or nothing! | Most decisions, even if you seem so serious at the moment, can be corrected later. |
Pessismism: I want to include everything that could happen in my considerations. But soon I'll just concentrate on the problems. | Make it clear that you are speculating. Consciously look for positive consequences. If that doesn't help, do the opposite: exaggerate your pessimism until it seems absurd and ridiculous. |
Perfectionism: I don't want to make a mistake or show weakness. | Everyone has flaws and weaknesses, allow yourself your own. And make yourself aware of the positive side of a possible wrong decision: What is your great chance to learn from it for the future? |
Now turn to the rational side of your decision: Take your time and think about what options you have to make a decision. The following two are helpful Methods:
Write down all possible alternatives - even if they seem unrealistic at first. Because: Having multiple alternatives is always better than being able to choose between two extreme options.
Perhaps there are already one or more alternatives that you want to choose intuitively? Write down your spontaneous feelings when listing the options. If you want, you can do this in the form of smileys or numbers between 0 and 5 (0 stands for negative, 5 for positive. This could look something like this:
Alternatives: | Feelings: | rating: |
redundancies | I have stomach ache | 0: |
Salary cuts for everyone | Not nice, but I can live with that | 3: |
Restructuring of the department | Great idea, but is it feasible? | 4: |
I cut salaries, instead monetary benefits for all employees | Good idea, but if that brings the necessary savings? | 3: |
Examining alternatives in detail and then rejecting them is not a waste of time: if you have thoroughly examined all options, you will be much better at your decision afterwards. And: Maybe after a thorough examination, you are choosing the most unlikely route?
So that you can now consider each of your alternatives with the possible consequences, you need facts - and this brings you to the most complex phase of the decision-making process. Do not neglect the research despite the time pressure. But be careful: If you accumulate too much information, you will lose track and only make the decision unnecessarily difficult.
Better: Limit the flow of information from the outset by asking specific questions about every aspect of your decision. The question How can I best save? will not help you because it is far too vague Your questions should narrow your problem much more. You will only get precise answers if you ask very carefully. This is particularly important when you delegate information gathering to someone else.
If you as a possible Alternatives For example, if you are thinking about laying off employees to save money, you should look specifically for information that will help you to decide in favor or against. You should ask such precise questions for each of your alternatives - only you get an objective picture.
Make a list of the most precise questions in writing and write down where you can find the answers. Weight: What exactly do you need to know and what not? | ||
Examples of exact questions: | Where can I find the information? | Important? (1: hardly, 5: very) |
Savings from other departments through layoffs? | Experiences of colleagues ,. Numbers from the company | 5: |
Long-term consequences for the motivation and productivity of the other employees? | Experiences of colleagues ,. Numbers and material from the company | 3: |
Far-reaching quality losses in the company? Which? | Experience and figures from the company. | 4: |
Were alternatives tried in the company? What result? | Experience in-house material | 5: |
Saving other companies through layoffs | Statistics (e.g. from economic institutes). | 2: |
Decline in quality / productivity at other companies | Media reports, statistics | 2: |
Current trends? | Statistics, media | 1: |
Do layoffs result in lack of purchasing power or loss of sales? | Statistics, media reports, experts | 1: |
Of course, finding the right information also means evaluating it. Unfortunately, you cannot always assume that your information is really neutral or complete. So always be critical. Be careful with blanket statements like Der Economy it is bad! Differentiate: Not all companies are doing badly. Things are already looking very different!
You are also influenced by the media, either directly or indirectly: There are trending topics that your colleagues will of course also discuss. This means that the topic is constantly present. You can evade this by being critical of the "trend" five W-phrases: question:
An example: You are looking for statistically proven studies that show you how to do it best Money can save. You come across two contradictory results and now you are wondering which one to believe. Clarify the statements in writing in key points, but also the intention of the two studies. Then think about why you chose this or that Information give more weight and note that too.
Notice: | ||
Content of the information
nation | longer working hours = lower wage costs = more growth | Management errors = wasted time = minus $ 190 billion / year |
From whom? | Institute for German Economy | Proudfoot Consulting (business consulting) |
Possible intention behind it | Does it help employers to work longer hours? | Does the company show a need for management consultancy services? |
I think | I think that's more important, more plausible because ... | I think that's more important, more plausible, because ... |
The overview is not only useful for you satisfaction: When your decisions are based on factual information that you have researched well and thoughtfully, you are less vulnerable to attacks critic.
Only when you know the facts can you really assess the consequences of your decision. You can of course roll the arguments back and forth in your head. However, it is better to write them down - for example as a pro and contra list. However, it is better than just evaluating the various aspects with + or - to work out each alternative with all the consistencies.
The consequences are at the same time the criteria for your decision. Rate the criteria with numbers between 0 and 5. - 5 if you expect this consequence to occur exactly like this and 0 if not. Describe yours Opinions moreover with words closer.
Rate all alternatives with the same criteria - this is the only way you can compare! For important criteria, double the value (for all alternatives!). If you add up the values, you will immediately see how you should make the best decision - purely mathematically, of course.
I fire three employees: | |||
saving times2: | 5 | Savings target achieved | |
Employees in my department | Affected | 3 | Only three employees |
Efficiency | 4 | Performance plus (fear?) | |
Motivation | 2 | dissatisfied | |
My backing | 2 | Loss of reputation | |
Satisfaction of other company | 5 | It doesn't concern them | |
Knowledge and quality remain | 1 | Good powers are lacking | |
Company image (turnover!) | 2 | Suffer | |
Satisfaction boss times2: | 5 | Exactly what he wanted | |
Satisfaction works council | 1 | trouble | |
Total: | 40: |
I demand less money and more work from everyone: | |||
saving times2: | 5 | Savings target achieved | |
0 | Only a few | 0 | All employees |
Efficiency | 3 | Performance increase questionable | |
Motivation | 2 | dissatisfied | |
My backing | 3 | Slight loss of reputation | |
Satisfaction of other company | 5 | It doesn't concern them | |
Knowledge and quality remain | 5 | Can be obtained | |
Company image (turnover!) | 4 | Suffers easily | |
Satisfaction boss times2: | 5 | So ok too | |
Satisfaction works council | 3 | Less trouble | |
Total: | 45: |
I completely restructure the department more efficiently: | |||
saving times2: | 3 | Still unclear | |
Employees in my department | Affected | 3 | All but positive |
Efficiency | 5 | performance Plus | |
Motivation | 5 | Satisfied | |
My backing | 5 | Ok, I'm trying | |
Satisfaction of other company | 1 | Fear of change | |
Knowledge and quality remain | 5 | Ja | |
Company image (turnover!) | 5 | Don't suffer | |
Satisfaction boss times2: | 2 | Could be trouble | |
Satisfaction works council | 5 | No hassle | |
Total: | 44: |
Salary cuts for all but non-cash benefits: | |||
saving times2: | 1 | Savings target questionable | |
Employees in my department | Affected | 2 | All but not difficult |
Efficiency | 4 | performance Plus | |
Motivation | 3 | Fairly satisfied | |
My backing | 4 | Ok, I'm trying | |
Satisfaction of other company | 4 | suspicious | |
Knowledge and quality remain | 5 | Ok | |
Company image (turnover!) | 3 | Don't suffer | |
Satisfaction boss times2: | 3 | Suspicious | |
Satisfaction works council | 4 | Hardly any trouble | |
Total: | 37: |
In purely arithmetical terms, in this example you can now decide to cut the salaries of all employees in order to save and be satisfied with them. You have made your decision according to very rational and logical considerations.
But if you are still not convinced, this result may be contrary to your "gut feeling". Just remind yourself again what you spontaneously thought when you considered the alternative: You had noted, for example, that you could live with cuts in wages. Restructuring in the department had you intuitively liked better and had a better evaluation.
Now you have to consider what is more important to you. Unfortunately, nobody can give you the general advice: Always listen to your stomach or your mind. Depending on the situation and your personal requirements (think about your parameters!), You have to decide again and again.
Rethink the various arguments. In this case, you might choose to cut your wages - simply because you spontaneously noted that restructuring may not be feasible and the rational considerations have confirmed this judgment.
If they are indecisive, you throw a coin - not to decide, but to remember what you actually want: Even while the coin is falling, you may hope for a head, because you actually want to cut salaries. Or you react spontaneously with reluctance when the coin falls on number, because you do not want to restructure.
The decision is made! But that's not all: Now you also have to be consistent Implementation take care of the solution.
If you have voted for others, you have to make sure that the employees understand and accept your decision. Explain why there was no alternative and why implementation is important for everyone. Do not be indecisive - other people also take unpleasant decisions positively if you argue them convincingly.
Act consistently, be a role model when it comes to implementation: Employees accept salary cuts if they do Company going bad. A raise for him Executive but then you do not understand!
Make clearwhy the decision was necessary. Set a realistic schedule and work towards it together. Emphasize the positive aspects that will come out. A good tool: draw a poster with all the important points. Hang it up for everyone to see. As an incentive, always update how much time is left and which partial successes you have already achieved.
How far are we with the implementation? | ||
What is the goal? | Make the department more efficient by restructuring: | |
Why is it necessary? | The company has to save! | |
What do we get from it? | - We secure our jobs:
- We work more efficiently: | |
By when? | In 3 months: | Still 9: weeks |
What needs to be done specifically and why? | Divide up the breaks well - there always has to be someone in a hurry.
Organize the shelves better so that you can find things faster Improve communication channels so that we need fewer meetings The tasks are very specific - everyone must always know what to do | |
What have we achieved? | Breaks are now better divided
Storage is better organized! |
Simone Janson is publisher, Consultant and one of the 10 most important German bloggers Blogger Relevance Index. She is also head of the Institute's job pictures Yourweb, with which she donates money for sustainable projects. According to ZEIT owns her trademarked blog Best of HR – Berufebilder.de® to the most important blogs for careers, professions and the world of work. More about her im Career. All texts by Simone Janson.
Sure, but all these tips are totally bullshit, it just depends on employees and companies to fit together. The human component has to be right.
Thank you for the publication of this important contribution, in fact you are very often involved in conflicts of conscience as a personnel.
This post reminds me of my first job, where I was hired to fire people.
thanks for that
Post a Comment