Role models for executives and bosses: Assertive or team-minded?


Work better, information as desired! We give you the information you really need and are committed to a better and more ecological working environment. When Book Publisher Best of HR – Berufebilder.de® with Unique Book Concept and eCourses we offer over 20 years of experience in Corporate Publishing - with Clients like Samsung, Otto, Governmental Institutions. Publisher Simone Janson also heads the Institute Berufebilder Yourweb, which awards scholarships, among other things, and was one of the top 20 female German bloggers, referenced in ARD, ZEIT, WELT, Wikipedia .
Copyright:  Artwork created as part of a free collaboration with Shutterstock. ,

For many executives, it is always important to readjust their role and behavioral patterns. To put it bluntly, it's about the contradiction between darling and idiot. What to do about it

Best of HR – Berufebilder.de®

Here writes for you:

 

Barbara Haag Fixed aspect ratio Barbara Haag is a management consultant and businesscoach.

  Profile

From the author:

Read


Everybody's darling or dork on duty?

In practice, this dilemma is as follows: If you are too nice, you will be liked, but perhaps not respected. If you are too harsh, you may be able to prevail, but you lose sympathy points. Ok - and how do you solve this dilemma now?

Whoever wants to push things can not be Everybody's Darling. Or is it? Those who value human contacts should be able to save themselves for private life. Is that so? Can one be really nice at work or have a strong social incompetence?

What prejudices do the representatives of the two camps face? Is there a golden mean? And how do executives find out whether the type “lonely wolf” or “Mr. Nice Guy ”fits; how can you assess the motivation behind the actions of your employees?

Tip: Text as PDF (please read the instructions!) Download or for a little more Book on the topic with discount or eCourse book. Actions or news via Newsletter!

A-types and B-types - cliché or reality?

Most of us know both extremes: colleagues A, who is competent and who is asked for support, because he is not afraid to go through when things need to be done quickly. When he is playing in the coffee kitchen, he is usually not there - and is not really missed on such occasions.

Then there are Collegues B, who just clashes with everyone, who also takes time for the interpersonal, which one can at any time ask for an assessment of the film, which he last seen in the cinema and which one then, depending on how the Judgment fails, also looks or not.

Who would you rather have in the team?

Who would you prefer in your team? Are you already working with both colleagues? Which of the two is the more competent?

For example, is it possible to imply that Type B is not as interested in his career as Type A (according to experience, B-types are often ignored in favor of A-types during promotions)? And how much feeling can you afford in everyday work?

Envy - but a good feeling?

Let's take as an example a supposedly "bad" feeling that we are always told not to allow: envy. The PsyBlog website explains the benefits of "benign envy," that boring feeling that we are missing something that we see in others.

Tip: Text as PDF (please read the instructions!) Download or for a little more Book on the topic with discount or eCourse book. Actions or news via Newsletter!

These little stitches may be good for us (as long as we feel the other deserves its success, otherwise we will really be seized only by an unproductive, destructive envy). Benevolent envy can motivate us, give us hope, make us more creative, and let us look at things from a different perspective.

Assertiveness does not make it more productive

PsyBlog also quotes an interesting study on the topic of enforcement and sympathy among executives. The results: In terms of productivity, the successes did not rise unrestrictedly parallel to the current performance of a manager.

According to the researchers, a particularly high level of assertiveness in terms of productivity is no better than a moderate level; In any case, it was better to be moderately assertive than not at all. In terms of sympathy (“social results”), the situation was similar:

Moderate degree of certainty

The sympathy curve did not rise infinitely in accordance with the ability to assert itself, but fell sharply. So it was definitely better to have a moderate degree of certainty than too much, the researchers concluded.

Combining the results of the two components results in a curve that is similar to an inverted U - so there must be an ideal point where social and economic outcomes meet.

Tip: Text as PDF (please read the instructions!) Download or for a little more Book on the topic with discount or eCourse book. Actions or news via Newsletter!

Drawers do not help

Last but not least, the question arises as to the extent to which the behavior of a person allows conclusions about his feelings, his motivation. This is especially important when it comes to compiling a team or filling key positions.

If you have a little knowledge of the human being and experience in dealing with others, you know that you can not go further with the idea of ​​drawers. Anyone who has experience in human resource management or leadership knows how many employees feel themselves out of place and in their role, how great is the danger of an internal termination and service according to regulations.

Identify potential employees in time

Personal diagnostic tools can help identify potentials, identify deficiencies, and provide the best possible support Companies and employees.

The potential lies in every employee, regardless of whether he always meets the ideal point on a curve or not. Recognizing and promoting is the task of every employer.

Tip: Text as PDF (please read the instructions!) Download or for a little more Book on the topic with discount or eCourse book. Actions or news via Newsletter!


More knowledge - PDF download, eCourse on demand or personal advice


Offline download: Download this text as PDF -  Read usage rights, Because we do not automatically submit the title of this text for privacy reasons: When buying in "interests" the title register if support is needed. After buying text exclusively Download at this URL (please save). Or for a little more directly an entire book or eCourse with this text buy, read on.

3,99 Book now


Read customer feedback and buy a book on this topic at a discount: Do you like this text and want to read more information about it? Buy the right book including this text, buy it here in two languages, as a member even with a 20 percent discount. Would you like to take a look at the book first? You can do this by previewing the book look at and then purchase on the book page.

German edition: ISBN 9783965964945

7,99  Buy directly

English version: ISBN 9783965964952 (Translation notice)

7,99  Buy directly


Your eCourse on Demand: Choose your personal eCourse on this or another desired topic, As a PDF download. Up to 30 lessons with each 4 learning task + final lesson. Please enter the title under "interests". Alternatively, we are happy to put together your course for you or offer you a personal regular eMailCourse including supervision and certificate - all further information!

19,99 Book now


Consultant packages: You want to increase your reach or address applicants as an employer? For these and other topics we offer special Consultant packages (overview) - For example, a personal phone call (price is per hour).

179,99 Book now



You want to comment here? Please the Debate Rules comply, contributions must be unlocked. Your eMailAddress remains secret. More information on the use of your data and how you can counter this can be found in our Privacy Policy.

  1. To follow debate on this post
  2. All debates follow
  1. Bernd

    Successful article, I really see a problem that many executives have.

    • Simone Janson

      Thanks for your comment.

  2. Jan

    Unfortunately, this article only conveys half the truth: Unfortunately, we live in a society that is in the process of being run down - subject to outsourcing and staff reduction. The companies live on credit and only hire employees on a temporary basis in order to reduce them again in good time because they can no longer afford the responsibility and long-term salaries resulting from pensions for older people. This is a pretty sad situation, and glossing over it by taking blame for personal failure doesn't make it any better.

    • Simone Janson

      Thanks for your comment, I see it a little differently, because it comes in the sum of each other. Or, as the saying goes, change yourself if you want to change the world.

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with * .

Ja, I would like to be informed about the latest promotions and offers via Newsletter be informed.

I hereby accept the Debate Rules and the Privacy policy with the possibility to contradict the use of my data at any time.