Your shopping cart is currently empty!
For their successful, good life Information you really need: Government-funded publisher, awarded the Global Business Award as Publisher of the Year: Books, Magazine, eCourses, data-driven AI-Services. Print and online publications as well as the latest technology go hand in hand - with over 20 years of experience, partners like this Federal Ministry of Education, customers like Samsung, DELL, Telekom or universities. behind it Simone Janson, German Top 10 blogger, referenced in ARD, FAZ, ZEIT, WELT, Wikipedia.
Disclosure & Copyright: The video material was provided by the creator of the video.
{Replica} Whistleblower, Anonymity & Data Protection: Wikileaks for HR Managers
By Simone Janson (More) • Last updated on October 11.02.2011, XNUMX • First published on 11.02.2011/XNUMX/XNUMX • So far 4926 readers, 1402 social media shares Likes & Reviews (5 / 5) • Read & write comments
Wikileaks - the topic can not be killed. This is by no means only a political but also an economic topic - and as such it is of particular interest to the personnel departments of companies.
Video Note: If you don't see a video here, you have to activate the option “Watch videos” at the end of the page under “Privacy and Cookies”!
Contents
Hide
- War for wiki leaks
- Who takes responsibility?
- Openleaks: mailbox concept without responsibility
- One is the stupid!
- A size smaller
- Whistelblowing for openness and transparency
- Knackpunkt Anonymity
- Questions, questions
- Top books on the subject
- Read text as PDF
- Advice on success, goal achievement or marketing
- Book eCourse on Demand
- Skate eBook as desired
War for wiki leaks
This week, ARD ran this 45-minute discussion “world power WikiLeaks? War on the Net”, which is now also available on vimeo (see video above). Yesterday took place in the HumboldtUniversity in Berlin that SPIEGEL-Forum with the topic “Public enemy Wikileaks - How Julian Assange challenges politics and the media” took place, which Markus Beckedahl accompanied live blogging.
Computer scientist Daniel Domscheidt-Berg, who helped set up and then left Wikileaks, is releasing his tell-all book Inside WikiLeaks: My Time at the World's Most Dangerous Website this week Welt” out that Spiegel Online extensively criticized.
Who takes responsibility?
The books on the subject (advertising)
Tip: You can also use this text as a PDF or an eCourse on the subject download. You can also find it in the shop exciting inspiration to experience your success, plus offers & news in Newsletter ! (Advertising)
On Tuesday I have Domscheidt mountain experienced personally at an event organized by the Heinrich Boell Foundation, In addition to the linked text, there is also a recording of the event at You Tube.
Jochen Mai and Klaus Eck, for example, raised the question of how Companys can respond to employee disloyalty. There is also another question - and that doesn't just apply to Wikileaks: who takes responsibility if something goes wrong?
Openleaks: mailbox concept without responsibility
Domscheidt-BergsConcept For the new leaking platform Openleaks, which he plans to offer shortly, I did not find it conclusive: unlike Wikileaks, it should never publish a leak on Openleaks itself.
Rather, the whistleblowers can do it themselves decide, which is connected to Openleaks editorial team, Organization or person the material is to be played. Responsibility for editing and publishing then lies entirely with the editors - and therefore they also have to bear the necessary legal consequences.
One is the stupid!
Discounts for your success (advertising)!
Openleaks, on the other hand, is completely out of responsibility - pointing out that one person alone can not decide where personal rights would be violated and what information will be published - and which not. That's true on the one hand, on the other hand, but on the other hand, a little cowardly and comfortable.
The heated discussions that then arose on exactly this point shows how explosive the question of who is responsible for such a topic is. Or to put it bluntly: nobody wants it to have been in the end. But, and that's that Problem in the whole thing: someone has to take on the ugly task.
A size smaller
By the way, the whole is also a few numbers smaller: The employer evaluation platform kununu is ultimately nothing more than a small Whistelblower platform: for if employers are judged objectively and differentiated, the employees do nothing but disclose business secrets.
One difference may be that the statements of the Employees not supported by documents here. That is exactly the point of criticism that is leveled at kununu often enough that in principle everyone takes revenge on his Executive to practice without being able to check it extensively - even if kununu promises checks.
Whistelblowing for openness and transparency
I find them Idea, that employees can say openly what they think of their employer (which is rare enough anyway!) is really good. I already wrote that yesterday. And I think it's good that employees-to-be also get such an insight into potential companies.
Sure, there is a risk of wild company bashing, fake positive (from the company) as well as negative (e.g. from the competition) reviews, because you can't even check whether an employee is really working there. But there is also a real opportunity for more transparency and openness, which companies are forced to do.
Knackpunkt Anonymity
However, and there you are fast back at Wikileaks, the anonymity of such rating platforms is of course a major sticking point: kununu guarantees full anonymity, but then still wants it eMailAddress.
The participation in kununu is absolutely anonymous and the protection of your data is one of our highest principles! All reviews appear only with a date on. The registration data serve only the prevention of misuse or the (voluntarily chosen) sending of a newsletter as well as the access to the own evaluation portal.
When I look at what's going on at Wikileaks and Openleaks to give users full anonymity without traceability, I'm a little scared - and I'm not really a privacy fanatic. I'm just thinking of how easy Stefan Niggemeier was to identify Konstantin Neven Dumont as an anonymous commentator.
Questions, questions
In view of this, the protection that kununu offers its users seems a little poor. Certainly it's not as bad as showing your anger at Facebook or Twitter made public air – but…. Maybe someone would like to enlighten me about how it is about anonymity and the Privacy is really ordered?
Top books on the subject
Read text as PDF
Acquire this text as a PDF (only for own use without passing it on according to Terms and conditions): Please send us one after purchase eMail with the desired title supportberufebilder.de, we will then send the PDF to you immediately. You can also purchase text series.
4,99€Buy
Advice on success, goal achievement or marketing
You have Ask about career, Recruiting, personal development or increasing reach? Our AIAdviser helps you for 5 euros a month – free for book buyers. We offer special ones for other topics IT services
5,00€ / per month Book
Book eCourse on Demand
Up to 30 lessons with 4 learning tasks each + final lesson as a PDF download. Please send us one after purchase eMail with the desired title supportberufebilder.de. Alternatively, we would be happy to put your course together for you or offer you a personal, regular one eMail-Course - all further information!
29,99€Buy
Skate eBook as desired
If our store does not offer you your desired topic: We will be happy to put together a book according to your wishes and deliver it in a format of yours Choice. Please sign us after purchase supportberufebilder.de
79,99€Buy
Here writes for you
Simone Janson is publisher, Consultant and one of the 10 most important German bloggers Blogger Relevance Index. She is also head of the Institute's job pictures Yourweb, with which she donates money for sustainable projects. According to ZEIT owns her trademarked blog Best of HR – Berufebilder.de® to the most important blogs for careers, professions and the world of work. More about her im Career. All texts by Simone Janson.
Popular Posts
-
{Meeting} Best of HR – Berufebilder.de® & the German Travel Association: Business Travel is a matter for the boss
-
Job profile! Serial Entrepreneur & Billionaire: From Failure to Shutterstock Founder
-
{Termin} ARD TV talk round with Simone Janson: “Leben” on EinsPlus about perfectionism
-
Collaborative Consumption & Change in Consumer Culture: Community More Important Than Property? {Trend! Study}
-
Job profile! & Careers in the fitness industry: 6 top jobs between muscle building & herbal bath
-
The 6 Best Locations on the Island for Team Building Incentives Strategy Meetings {Reader's Travel Tip}
-
Time management multitasking self management: commit yourself - 5 steps
-
University rankings when choosing a degree: Leaderboards that offer orientation?
9 answers to “{Replica} Whistleblower, Anonymity & Data Protection: Wikileaks for HR Managers”
-
It has already become strangely quiet around Wikileaks and Julian Assange. Of course, it could also be that deals have expired in the background. Financial means, impunity in the history of rape, a certain status, as only countries can lend, who knows? After all, it is striking that after the initial global hype, which was unparalleled, now tends to zero. Greetings from Berlin
-
Hello Mrs. Janson,
I am glad that you basically support the idea of an employer rating.
As you write correctly, companies recognize the opportunity behind employer reviews (yet) and focus on the adverse aspects of online reviews.
In contrast to hotels or book authors, however, it is very easy for companies to provide a representative image - a circular mail to all employees depicts the company's reality ....
In my experience, it is above all those companies and HR departments who are particularly reluctant to give evaluations when they actually have “dirty work” or do not want deficiencies in personnel policy and management to come to light.
What our visitors appreciate about kununu is that they don't just find whitewashing - but that also includes a good deal of criticism.
Incidentally, we do not take companies that do not take us seriously seriously, but rather consult those who have already recognized the importance of employees as corporate ambassadors, online reputation management, and the popularity of rating platforms among job seekers.
Best regards,
Martin Poreda
-
Hello Mr. Poreda,
I agree with you, it is often precisely the companies that oppose transparency that have something to hide - that's kind of logical ;-) That the sustainable opportunities of social media communication are often not recognized and people instead look for quick benefits or rather see the negative - I just wrote a blog post about that. That there is little communication with the employee seems only logical.
-
-
Interesting discussion m. @ Kununu_BRA_BOYS Martin Poreda: #kununu as #wikileaks f.employer o.nicht? Discuss with!
-
Hello Mr. Poreda,
Thanks for the prompt comment including link to the explanatory blog post. But I'm not completely convinced: Maybe it will not be a financial loss if one or the other does not apply.
However, some ladies and gentlemen involved in personnel marketing would now object that such negative reviews could fundamentally damage the employer brand - and the matter therefore has economic implications.
Otherwise, this would then have to be reckoned with corresponding consequences for the evaluator.So far, however, it seems to me that companies are not really taking such rating platforms seriously and are dismissing them as aimless employer bashing - by the way, this not only affects kununu, but also similar rating platforms.
On the one hand, this may be due to the fact that such a negative rating can easily be dismissed as an act of revenge on the Internet, but also because it is not to be feared that economic damage will occur.
The potential for a positive change is given away.I still like the basic idea of allowing a look behind the scenes.
gruß
Simone Janson -
Hello Mrs. Janson,
thank you for this interesting article. I am happy to dispel your concerns. First of all - kununu clearly distances itself from the Wikileaks philosophy - I commented on this in a blog post some time ago:
For your anonymity / privacy concerns. kununu is not a new offer on the web and proves for over 3,5 years a responsible use of the (few) data that we demand from our reviewers to prevent misuse of our platform. We are constantly investing time and money in data security and an externally visible characteristic of this is that ratings are given, for example, encrypted (https: //). (by the way, we are the only platform of our kind that offers that).
Since kununu started in 2007, various sources have repeatedly attested to the responsible handling of the topic of employer evaluation, both in the direction of users and “Affected persons = companies”.
The trust of our visitors in kununu and the protection of the evaluators is our priority and has always been lived by us. Therefore, there has never been, and will continue to be, no misuse of the data of kununu users.
I would be glad to answer further questions.
Best regards sends
Martin Poreda / co-founder / kununu.com
-
Whistelblower, anonymity & data protection: Wikileaks for HR #Business
Commented on Twitter -
Whistelblower, anonymity & data protection: Wikileaks for HR professionals
-
Whistelblower, anonymity & data protection: Wikileaks for HR: You might also be interested in ...
Post a Comment