Your shopping cart is currently empty!
For their successful, good life Information you really need: Government-funded publisher, awarded the Global Business Award as Publisher of the Year: Books, Magazine, eCourses, data-driven AI-Services. Print and online publications as well as the latest technology go hand in hand - with over 20 years of experience, partners like this Federal Ministry of Education, customers like Samsung, DELL, Telekom or universities. behind it Simone Janson, German Top 10 blogger, referenced in ARD, FAZ, ZEIT, WELT, Wikipedia.
Disclosure & Copyright: Images created as part of a free collaboration with Shutterstock.
By Simone Janson (More) • Last updated on October 16.02.2012, XNUMX • First published on 16.02.2012/XNUMX/XNUMX • So far 4823 readers, 1567 social media shares Likes & Reviews (5 / 5) • Read & write comments
Yesterday I posted here in the first part about my Problems with the Amazon A-z-Guarantee as Seller reported on Amazon Marketplace. I then got to the bottom of the matter legally. And the legal construction is unfortunately quite tricky.
First of all, one has to distinguish between the legal and the essential: there is a contractual relationship between Amazon.de and buyer - and one between Amazon.de and seller. Amazon.de can offer the buyer as his contractual partner every guarantee possible and which can look as Amazon.de would like.
This alone would have had no further impact for me as a seller, because the contractual partner of the buyer is in this case Amazon.de. And Amazon.de and the buyer can not negotiate a contract, which the seller as a third party without his consent to something committed. The conclusion of a contract at the expense of third parties is ineffective.
Conversely, the seller also has no way to influence whether and under which conditions Amazon.de gives buyers an independent guarantee, after all, this guarantee is not granted by the seller.
As the buyer with the request A-z-Guarantee assigns all claims against the seller to Amazon.de, Amazon.de assumes the legal position of the buyer in this respect. Amazon.de can then do this as a recourse from the seller Money claim that the buyer has received back.
The decision by Amazon.de for or against the granting of a guarantee to the buyer is not necessarily legally binding for the seller, since he has not entered into any contractually effective recourse or indemnification obligation towards Amazon.
This means that the guaranty of the guaranty does not have to be a legal requirement for the recovery of the guarantee. However, Amazon.de reserves the right to recourse in its terms of participation expressly:
“Amazon.de reserves the right to demand damages from the seller if the respective buyer of the item fails to fulfill the contract of sale in accordance with the Regulate will be compensated by the A to Z guarantee of Amazon.de.”
And exactly because of these conditions, Amazon.de made me regressful!
Anyone who sells books on the Amazon marketplace, even as a private seller, can face difficulties if items are lost during shipping, for example. Because Amazon then refunds the buyer Costs – and then simply keeps them from the buyer. Arbitrary or legally correct?
Since the 18. June 2007 Amazon.de is apparently no longer willing to stay on the cost of the A-to-Z-Guarantee applications, because since then it is on Amazon.de according to fixed specifications that apply to products not received. The question of how binding these specifications are, I will pick up again below.
I started nevertheless complaining to Amazon.de, with all objections, which would have existed also against the buyer, if this had not claimed the guarantee performance of Amazon.de and its rights had not assigned to Amazon.de.
However, I had now exclusively deal with Amazon.de and no longer deal with the buyer - which has hardly simplified the matter.
An argument from me: Amazon.de has already given the buyer the guarantee “on first call”, without checking in detail whether there is a legal claim at all.
Therefore, I was given no opportunity to the post-fulfillment (eg by sending it again), although I offered it several times to the buyer and then Amazon.de and the procedure provided for in the law for the assertion of deficiency claims has not been complied with.
The counter-argument of Amazon.de in one eMail the press office read:
“In this case, the A-to-z guarantee applies and unfortunately we cannot offer a subsequent delivery if the Customer insists on fulfilling the guarantee.”
Another argument: I relied on § 447 BGB according to which the buyer under certain conditions - and the goods were according to information from a lawyer certainly given - carries the shipping risk.
Because the Civil Code does not see any for non-commercial providers engagement reserves the right to bear the shipping risk, ie to provide compensation for shipments that have not arrived, regardless of fault on your part. All I would have to do is prove that I packed and sent the shipment properly.
For Amazon.de, however, this proof is only considered to be provided if the shipment insured was sent – an employee explained to me over the phone. And only if I had proved that I had actually sent my book (and had written this when Amazon.de asked me for a statement) would Amazon.de have been open to discussion.
However, legally insured shipping would not be required to prove that the book was actually sent. It would also be possible to prove this by means of testimonies or documents from the transport companies involved.
Acquire this text as a PDF (only for own use without passing it on according to Terms and conditions): Please send us one after purchase eMail with the desired title supportberufebilder.de, we will then send the PDF to you immediately. You can also purchase text series.
4,99€Buy
You have Ask round to Career, Recruiting, personal development or increasing reach? Our AI consultant will help you for 5 euros a month – free for book buyers. We offer special ones for other topics IT services
5,00€ / per month Book
Up to 30 lessons with 4 learning tasks each + final lesson as a PDF download. Please send us one after purchase eMail with the desired title supportberufebilder.de. Alternatively, we would be happy to put your course together for you or offer you a personal, regular one eMail-Course - all further information!
29,99€Buy
If our store does not offer you your desired topic: We will be happy to put together a book according to your wishes and deliver it in a format of yours Choice. Please sign us after purchase supportberufebilder.de
79,99€Buy
Simone Janson is publisher, Consultant and one of the 10 most important German bloggers Blogger Relevance Index. She is also head of the Institute's job pictures Yourweb, with which she donates money for sustainable projects. According to ZEIT owns her trademarked blog Best of HR – Berufebilder.de® to the most important blogs for careers, professions and the world of work. More about her im Career. All texts by Simone Janson.
The communication with Amazon seems to be similarly one-sided, as the communication with ebay and paypal, the allegedly lost goods likewise the buyer unproven. For this reason I use paypal no longer and send (at the expense of the buyer) basically insured.
This must be described in the offer as well.
Yes. Amazon is also sitting abroad. Good method you have. At Ebay is also good. The problem with Amazon: You have to automatically specify a higher price, but since the overview is not specifically indicated at Amazon. That is, Amazon forcing its volume vendors to virtually uninsured shipping, because otherwise you sold nothing. The differentiation shipping costs / price can not be made at Amazon simply, because the simply flat three euro for the dispatch but do not cover the insured shipment. Writing it into the article description brings nothing, which reads yes none. And in the end, the buyers, who do not understand it in the majority, are simply sour.
Be the first.
Just as written: For books, Amazon is simply the better marketplace.
Anti-Amazon initiative founded: Are private sellers liable to recourse ?: Who sells books on Amazon Marketplace
#Blogpost Anti-Amazon-Initiative established: Are retailers liable for recourse?
Post a Comment